fbpx
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Sign up for Free Newsletter
  • Print Edition
    • Get Home Delivery
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Customer Support
    • Submit A News Tip
    • Where’s My Paper?
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial
Hudson Valley One
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Featured Events
      • Art
      • Books
      • Kids
      • Lifestyle & Wellness
      • Food & Drink
      • Music
      • Nature
      • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Help Wanted
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Podcast
  • Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Featured Events
      • Art
      • Books
      • Kids
      • Lifestyle & Wellness
      • Food & Drink
      • Music
      • Nature
      • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Help Wanted
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Podcast
  • Log In
No Result
View All Result
Hudson Valley One
No Result
View All Result

In court, expert criticizes Saugerties dump testing that found dangerous contaminants

by Christina Coulter
September 23, 2019
in General News
3
Controversial Saugerties dumping restrained, but not stopped

The 1446 Route 212 dump (photo by Christina Coulter)

The 1446 Route 212 dump (photo by Christina Coulter)

An environmental engineer testifying on behalf of C&D debris dump owner Joe Karolys in state Supreme Court Wednesday, Sept. 11 attempted to poke holes in state Department of Environmental Conservation test results that showed dangerous levels of toxic materials in the three dumpsites.

According to testing ordered by the DEC during a court-ordered raid of Karolys’ Saugerties properties in May, samples taken from the properties contain state-prohibited levels of heavy metals, such as lead and mercury, and pesticides like DDT. Robert LoPinto, whose firm Walden Environmental Engineering has branches in Oyster Bay and Hopewell Junction, asserted that there were mathematical errors in the DEC’s findings, that the “chain of custody” for who handled the material and when it was handled wasn’t thorough enough and left room for error, and that not enough samples had been taken from the properties to meet the DEC’s self-imposed construction and demolition debris testing guidelines.

“The DEC basically collected two samples at each location, while the chain of custody shows in some locations five samples,” said LoPinto, who said he was being paid $250 per hour, including travel time, for his testimony. “Two of them were background, one shows a different set of chemicals shown in their report. In an area over 10,000 yards … you need at least 12 samples. They only had two.”

Wednesday was the fifth session in the Article 78 hearing to determine whether the town’s stop-work order against Karolys’ operation was legal. Karolys has also been slapped with stop-work orders from the DEC and the county health department. But the dumping continues at the sites on Route 212, Fel Qui Road and Goat Hill Road pending a decision from state Supreme Court Judge Richard Mott.

On the stand, LoPinto argued that the collection methods used during the May raid and described by DEC engineer David Pollock at a previous court session were invalid.

“I went to each site and, after walking around and observing what was there, I scraped away the top layer that was there, which was about an inch deep,” LoPinto said of his process during his Aug. 21 visit to Karolys’ dumps. “I took a rock and I scraped the soil away from a six-by-18-inch area, scraped it down an inch or so, picked up the material in my hand, picked it up, put it back down and observed the material. And that is what I did at each location.”

“You stuck your hand … into the pile?” asked Mott. “What were the dimensions of the pile? You stuck your hand in it? And that’s an inspection of what’s in the pile?”

“Let’s contrast that with what you did in coming in and rendering your opinion,” said Greco to LoPinto. “If I understand your testimony correctly, you came in and … walked to the approximate center of each of the three sites … and you reached down and looked down and felt with your hand. … Would you agree that the DEC sampling, regardless of how you may quibble with the particulars of it, can you agree that the DEC sampling was much more [thorough] than your own?”

LoPinto conceded his testing was not as thorough as the state agency’s, but said the DEC was biased in choosing which locations on the sites it took samples from, while LoPinto said he took his hand samples from randomly selected sites.

“Would you agree that the size and scope of the material on the property is of genuine concern to a municipality?” Greco asked LoPinto. “Would you agree that the potential for contamination increases as the volume of material increases?”

LoPinto did agree with these things.

“Let’s assume this is true and DEC totally botched this entire process,” said an apparently exasperated Mott to Higgins. “How is that relevant in any way shape or form to any disparate treatment that your client received at the hands of the respondent, which I have been asking you to focus on for this entire testimony?”

“I’ve been trying to tell the court …” Higgins responded before Mott cut him off with a curt, “Let’s get to it.”

After further testimony, the matter was adjourned until Thursday, Sept. 12. Karolys will also appear in town court on Sept. 13 at 9 a.m. on the matter of charges against him that he accepted truckloads of C&D material onto his properties outside of the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. timeframe set forth in Mott’s original restraining order which blocked the town’s original stop-work order. At Karolys’ Aug. 22 arraignment on the charges, an attorney from Higgins’ law firm requested that the trial take place in another town, arguing that Karolys would not receive a fair trial in Saugerties. But Town Justice Chris Kraft pointed out that jury bias would not be an issue as it’s not a jury trial.

Since then, according to town Assistant Code Enforcement Officer Kevin Brown, Karolys has been cited for additional dumping instances that allegedly took place after 3 p.m. on Aug. 28 and 29.

Tags: saugerties c&d dump
Before you click away... grab a free month of HV1. Get unlimited access. Get the news you've been missing. Get connected to your community. Keep local journalism alive at $5/mo., or cancel anytime. And enjoy summer!
- Geddy Sveikauskas, Publisher
Previous Post

Taste of New Paltz returns

Next Post

Kingston woman charged with welfare fraud, grand larceny

Christina Coulter

Related Posts

Woodstock officials discuss connections to state trails
General News

Committee proposes ARP funding be used to ease affordable housing crunch

August 15, 2022
The puzzle of post-pandemic real estate
General News

Woodstock Housing Alliance receives non-profit status

August 11, 2022
Second testing disproves Covid cluster at Woodland Pond
General News

Senior living facility shows unwillingness to pay recreation fees

August 10, 2022
Kingston considers upping reservoir’s capacity
Environment

Kingston declares Drought Emergency with watering restrictions, boil water near Stony Run

August 2, 2022
Elting Library Fair honors Sally Rhoads and Carol Roper
General News

Defending against lawsuit will cost taxpayers 25k

August 1, 2022
CCA program comes to a premature end…for now
General News

CCA program comes to a premature end…for now

August 1, 2022
Next Post
Vice crackdown in Saugerties and Port Ewen

Kingston woman charged with welfare fraud, grand larceny

Please login to join discussion

Trending News

  • Sawyer Ice Cream is your grandfather’s shake shack 1.1k views
  • Phony crosswalk covered over 1k views
  • City of Kingston raises drought emergency to Stage II 0.9k views
  • Dutchess exec Molinaro challenges Ryan in special election for congress 831 views
  • Battery maker Zinc8 plans manufacturing at former IBM plant 627 views







Latest HV1 Podcast

Weather

Kingston
◉
75°
Cloudy
6:06 am7:53 pm EDT
Feels like: 75°F
Wind: 5mph N
Humidity: 57%
Pressure: 30.01"Hg
UV index: 4
ThuFriSat
86/59°F
90/63°F
88/63°F
Weather forecast Kingston, New York ▸

Ulster County COVID-19 Active Cases

Subscribe

Independent. Local. Substantive. Subscribe now.

  • Subscribe & Support
  • Sign up for Free Newsletter
  • Print Edition
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial

© 2022 Ulster Publishing

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Featured Events
      • Art
      • Books
      • Kids
      • Lifestyle & Wellness
      • Food & Drink
      • Music
      • Nature
      • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Help Wanted
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Podcast
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Contact Us
    • Customer Support
    • Advertise
    • Submit A News Tip
  • Print Edition
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
    • Where’s My Paper
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Log In
  • Free HV1 Trial

© 2022 Ulster Publishing