Can Central Hudson merger be overturned?

 (Photo by Horia Varlan)

(Photo by Horia Varlan)

The New York State Public Service Commission’s approval last week of the $1.5 billion acquisition of Central Hudson by Canadian holding company Fortis Inc. represents a victory of corporate interests over the public interest, a victory made possible in large part by the gutting of consumer protections in the state and a corporate-funded massive media campaign, which citizens simply couldn’t compete with.

At least according to Assemblyman Kevin Cahill, whose district includes most of Ulster County and northern Dutchess County. (It used to include Saugerties.) Describing Fortis’ $49.25 million package of promised ratepayer benefits as “the weakest ever for a public utility in a takeover,” Cahill, said one of the prime reasons the deal got through was that key former consumer protection organizations, such as the Consumer Protection Board and the Citizens Utility Board, have been dissolved, leaving ratepayers without a voice.

Two years ago, the Utility Intervention Unit of the Consumer Protection Board had been dismantled and shifted over the state Department of State, where it was no longer an independent entity and reduced to a staff of two. (That compares to more than 20 people in New Jersey and around 30 in Connecticut who advocate on behalf of the public for utility-related issues, Cahill said.) Both people supported the deal, which Cahill attributed to a lack of resources to properly investigate. In contrast, in the past, when it was part of the Consumer Protection Board, it could challenge rulings more easily, an ability that “significantly constrained” the authority of the Commission, Cahill said.


“In this case, the Commission had a high level of confidence its decision would not be subject to review,” he said.

Cahill also said he was “nervous” about future Central Hudson rate increases. While Fortis promised to hold electric and gas delivery rates steady through July 1, 2015, the assemblyman theorized that Fortis, now having to deal with $1.5 billion worth of acquisition costs, will try to get that money back as fast as it can. “Invariably, those costs are recovered through the rate process,” said Cahill.

Cahill isn’t the only one angry about the PSC’s vote. In its statement last week, Citizens for Local Power, an Ulster-based grassroots group whose lobbying efforts against the merger were joined by 16 municipalities that passed resolutions opposed to the deal, accused the Commission of making a decision “without providing any substantive response to the many risks and problems documented by CLP and the Municipal Consortium in Opposition.”

The commission “has rubber-stamped a proposal that serves corporate interests at the expense of the communities affected by this decision,” noted CLP’s statement. It ignored “Fortis’ weaker financial status and high debt load,” which “will inevitably lead to higher rates for customers and may endanger the very existence of the local utility.”

In 2012, Fortis and CH Energy Group, Central Hudson’s parent company, announced that it and Fortis had entered into an agreement for Fortis to acquire CH Energy Group for $65 in cash per share, representing an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.5 billion, including the assumption of approximately $500 million of debt at closing.

Central Hudson, the main business of CH Energy Group, serves about 300,000 electric and 75,000 natural gas customers in eight Mid-Hudson counties.


There is one comment

  1. Miklos Galata

    Whom do you think would of end up paying for the $500 million debt that CH Energy Group accumulated over the years in the end? The customers througt rate increases of course. You are lucky that this take over took place (Fortis is fair) and you don’t have to pay higher rates at least for a few more years so stop crying about it and look at the bright side.

Comments are closed.