fbpx
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Print Edition
    • Get Home Delivery
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Submit Your Event
    • Customer Support
    • Submit A News Tip
    • Send Letter to the Editor
    • Where’s My Paper?
  • Our Newsletters
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial
Hudson Valley One
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s UP
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Subscribe to the What’s UP newsletter
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Log Out
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s UP
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Subscribe to the What’s UP newsletter
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Log Out
No Result
View All Result
Hudson Valley One
No Result
View All Result

Village may merge planning, historic boards

by Robert Ford
April 13, 2016
in Local History, Politics & Government
0
Village Mayor William Murphy (left) says the move is a win-win, but Historic Review Board chair Richard Frisbie (right) suspects there are other, unstated motives at play (photos by Dion Ogust and Andy Uzzle)
Village Mayor William Murphy (left) says the move is a win-win, but Historic Review Board chair Richard Frisbie (right) suspects there are other, unstated motives at play (photos by Dion Ogust and Andy Uzzle)

The Saugerties Village Board is considering combining the village planning and historic review boards to speed up the application process for projects, but past and present Review Board members say the real motivation is to get the board out of the way.

All new construction and renovations (including signage) within the village business district and south-side historic area must appear before the Review Board, which has a reputation for punctiliousness in carrying out its mission to ensure work conforms with the village’s historic character.

“It will just make the application process easier and cheaper for the applicant,” said Village Mayor William Murphy. “It would be one-stop shopping.”

Review Board chair Richard Frisbie sees something more sinister afoot, explaining, “We have a Village Board with (almost) every member appointed and then elected running unopposed,” he wrote in an email. “Then re-elected. The boards are all appointed annually — at whim. Not us. We are the only board that answers to a higher power. We are the only board independent of the village politics. It stands to reason (and I don’t know this to be true) that this is a way to bring things under control. I say that because if I had that much power that’s what I’d do.”

According to Murphy, trustees are considering merging the two boards to save applicants time and money. Fewer boards means fewer fees paid to lawyers and engineers, and less time needed to review proposals. Under the new proposal, the applicant who is in the historic district would have to go before only one board, pay his experts for only one set of meetings. The process might only take a month or two. He said the change would keep the village business-friendly.

Former Review Board and current town Historic Preservation Commission member Michael Sullivan Smith said the move could threaten the village’s Certified Local Government status, a distinction granted by the state Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, which provides grants and requires an approved historical preservation ordinance and appointment of a “qualified preservation review commission.” Smith said the change would “dissolve the village Historic Review Board and also our CLG status.” (See this week’s Letters to the Editor.)

Murphy disputes this.

“As usual Mr. Smith is wrong, as our village attorney has already done all the research on this and it is perfectly legal,” he wrote in an email, adding that trustees Terry Parisian and Patrick Landewe, liaisons to the review and planning boards, respectively, have also worked on the issue.

Murphy added that Smith’s statements were “sour grapes” stemming from previous conflicts.

The situation calls to mind another conflict between the Review Board and mayor — Murphy’s predecessor, Robert Yerick, who sought to dismiss most of the board after its intercession in the review process of the Diamond Mills Hotel and Convention Center, which he felt would needlessly delay that project.

“This is not the way that Bob Yerick tried to do it,” Murphy said. “This is to streamline the system and would still provide for historic review.”

Each board now has five members. Murphy said a combined board would have seven members with two alternates. The alternates would vote on applications if there were not enough full-time members present to make a voting quorum. By retaining members of the Review Board, the new board would not suffer from lack of expertise on matters unique to the historic districts, said Murphy.

When asked if he believes a new Planning Board system would work, Frisbie said, “I don’t believe the idea is well conceived, presented or considered.” He said he doesn’t believe the plan has much support and should not move forward.

Trustees will discuss the proposal at their Nov. 3 workshop meeting at 5 p.m. at Village Hall on Partition St.

Tags: historic review board
Join the family! Grab a free month of HV1 from the folks who have brought you substantive local news since 1972. We made it 50 years thanks to support from readers like you. Help us keep real journalism alive.
- Geddy Sveikauskas, Publisher

Robert Ford

Related Posts

Rent regulated landlords face the pressure to sell. Who will buy?
Politics & Government

Rent regulated landlords face the pressure to sell. Who will buy?

July 10, 2025
Zena Development principals explain their project
Politics & Government

Zena developer wants to keep his options open

July 10, 2025
New Paltz police commissioners named, council members shamed
Politics & Government

New Paltz’s police commission abolished

July 9, 2025
Police arrest Poughkeepsie man for filming sexual abuse of unconscious person; believe there may be other victims
Politics & Government

Town of Woodstock hires sex offender

July 10, 2025
Community discussion begins on New Paltz policing
Politics & Government

New Paltz police tension

July 8, 2025
Police departments, rescue squads reorganize for socially distanced first response
Politics & Government

Eminent-domain powers tested in appellate court

July 3, 2025
Next Post

Voters set to cast ballots

Weather

Kingston, NY
70°
Fair
5:32 am8:31 pm EDT
Feels like: 70°F
Wind: 2mph W
Humidity: 95%
Pressure: 30.03"Hg
UV index: 0
WedThuFri
91°F / 73°F
91°F / 73°F
84°F / 63°F
powered by Weather Atlas

Subscribe

Independent. Local. Substantive. Subscribe now.

  • Subscribe & Support
  • Print Edition
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
  • Our Newsletters
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial

© 2022 Ulster Publishing

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Art
    • Books
    • Kids
    • Lifestyle & Wellness
    • Food & Drink
    • Music
    • Nature
    • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Contact Us
    • Customer Support
    • Advertise
    • Submit A News Tip
  • Print Edition
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
    • Where’s My Paper
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Log In
  • Free HV1 Trial
  • Subscribe to Our Newsletters
    • Hey Kingston
    • New Paltz Times
    • Woodstock Times
    • Week in Review

© 2022 Ulster Publishing