fbpx
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Print Edition
    • Get Home Delivery
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Submit Your Event
    • Customer Support
    • Submit A News Tip
    • Send Letter to the Editor
    • Where’s My Paper?
  • Our Newsletters
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial
Hudson Valley One
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s UP
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Subscribe to the What’s UP newsletter
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Log Out
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s UP
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Subscribe to the What’s UP newsletter
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Log Out
No Result
View All Result
Hudson Valley One
No Result
View All Result

Environmental review of proposed Ulster power plant is set

by Crispin Kott
May 8, 2018
in General News
5
Opponents want proposed Ulster power plant to go away
The site of the proposed power plant

After months of often-tense public response over a proposed 20-megawatt electric-generating power plant, the Ulster Town Board last month adopted a scoping document detailing plans for an environmental review of the project.

At April 19’s town board meeting, Supervisor James Quigley III and councilmen voted unanimously to accept the scoping document for the Lincoln Park Grid Support Center, a project developed by Lincoln Park DG LLC and sponsored by GlidePath, an energy concern based in the Midwest.

The power plant would operate on a small parcel of a 121-acre site currently owned by Kingston Landing LLC off Frank Sottile Boulevard. According to the developer’s plans, a building housing the equipment would stand between 30-40 feet in height and an exhaust stack would rise above the structure. Developers were initially determined to keep the stack below the 100-foot height limit for the area; several weeks ago they said they’d scaled back the proposed height to around 80 feet and hoped to get the stack lower than the tree line along the property, which is roughly 70 feet high. The project would include a 20 MW lithium ion battery array and natural gas-powered reciprocating engine generators which would switch to onsite low-sulfur diesel stored in a tank if the gas supply is disrupted.

Some of the public issues raised during a series of GlidePath presentations and town board meetings were still at the fore prior to councilmen adopting the plan as some details in the document continued to rankle. Dan Furman, a neighbor of the proposed project site, said questions about what the plant might sound like in the middle of the night would not be adequately addressed by the testing requirements in the scoping document.

“I was up here several times over the last couple months saying I want to know what this thing sounds like at 4 a.m. on a December night with no leaves on the trees,” said Furman. “Let me ask you guys: Is that an unreasonable request? We asked for when the trees are bare and during the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., meaning the overnight, and somebody, whoever wrote this final scope, did read some of the comments, because they added the word ‘evening’ in the draft scope. If you ask the lawyer when we should test in the evening, they’re going to say, ‘6 p.m. That’s the evening.’ That’s not good enough.”

Prior to adopting the environmental review plans, the board amended the section relating to testing to accommodate Furman’s concerns.

“The applicant has indicated to me that they have no problem proceeding with additional tests if they are asked for them,” said Quigley. “Give it to me in writing, I will give it to them and make a request.”

Area resident Robert Barton said the scoping document didn’t make it clear enough who put the whole thing together, asking for greater transparency as the process moves forward.

“I would like to see who wrote and generated this document,” said Barton. “I think it should be part of the document who wrote it, who it is.”

Quigley said that the document had been prepared according to state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) guidelines, adding that town officials had also reviewed the information.

“We had two independent consultants and the alternative town engineers wrote this using a standard industry template … which was what the SEQR requirements call for,” said Quigley. “It gets expanded or contracted based upon the facts and elements of the specific project. It has been expanded based upon the comments. We’ve had two consultants and the engineers go through it. I’ve gone through it twice. My comments are here.”

Laura Hartmann of the new group Town of Ulster Citizens.org said that plans for a larger 1,200-megawatt power plant in North Bergen, N.J. might render the Lincoln Park Grid Support Center unnecessary.

“I think that should be mentioned somehow to GlidePath,” said Hartmann. “If that does happen, the need for this up here is definitely reduced.”

Included in the developer’s response is identifying the benefits of the project along with whether it’s even necessary, and some critics have noted that the plant would be of more use to people downstate than in the Hudson Valley.

Other concerns the developer will need to address include the potential visual impact within the Hudson River National Landmark Historic District, along with a study of whether the project fits in with the state’s increasingly green energy plan, the potential impact on amphibians and bats and the need for precise study of the boundaries of nearby federal wetlands.

How the project would impact employment and local taxes will also have to be addressed, as will the addition of a spill prevention and emergency response plan for the diesel storage tanks and any other potentially hazardous materials kept on the site.

In a prepared statement, GlidePath Chief Development Officer Peter Rood touted the depth of the scoping document and expressed confidence that the developer will be able to address any issues in the plan.

“This is a very thorough scope that was created with input from the public and leadership by the Town of Ulster,” said Rood. “We look forward to completing the full environmental analysis of the Lincoln Park Grid Support Center, providing detailed information to the public and ensuring that the project fully complies with all legal requirements for development.”

Tags: glidepathulster power plant
Join the family! Grab a free month of HV1 from the folks who have brought you substantive local news since 1972. We made it 50 years thanks to support from readers like you. Help us keep real journalism alive.
- Geddy Sveikauskas, Publisher

Crispin Kott

Crispin Kott was born in Chicago, raised in New York and has called everywhere from San Francisco to Los Angeles to Atlanta home. A music historian and failed drummer, he’s written for numerous print and online publications and has shared with his son Ian and daughter Marguerite a love of reading, writing and record collecting.

 Crispin Kott is the co-author of the Rock and Roll Explorer Guide to New York City (Globe Pequot Press, June 2018), the Little Book of Rock and Roll Wisdom (Lyons Press, October 2018), and the Rock and Roll Explorer Guide to San Francisco and the Bay Area (Globe Pequot Press, May 2021).

Related Posts

Kingston Land Trust launches fundraising campaign for “teeny Yosemite”
General News

City folks learn kinda slow

April 22, 2025
Daytime raccoon sightings spark concern among Saugerties residents
General News

Daytime raccoon sightings spark concern among Saugerties residents

March 31, 2025
Proposed cannabis dispensary at Zero Place triggers traffic study
Community

Zero Place in New Paltz transformed into condominiums, sparking concerns for affordable housing board

April 17, 2025
Local LGBTQ+ advocates rally to oppose passport freeze
Community

Local LGBTQ+ advocates rally to oppose passport freeze

February 18, 2025
A cold Valentine’s Day message for bus passengers in New Paltz
Community

A cold Valentine’s Day message for bus passengers in New Paltz

February 15, 2025
Letter: Cyclists, pedestrians at risk
Community

Henry W. DuBois bike path closed in New Paltz  

January 15, 2025
Next Post
Half dozen Onteora students receive suspensions for walking out on April 20

Onteora students suspended for walkout propose Activism Task Force

Please login to join discussion

Weather

Kingston, NY
59°
Fair
5:18 am8:33 pm EDT
Feels like: 59°F
Wind: 1mph ESE
Humidity: 73%
Pressure: 30.09"Hg
UV index: 0
SatSunMon
64°F / 55°F
68°F / 55°F
72°F / 59°F
Kingston, NY climate ▸

Subscribe

Independent. Local. Substantive. Subscribe now.

  • Subscribe & Support
  • Print Edition
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
  • Our Newsletters
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial

© 2022 Ulster Publishing

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Art
    • Books
    • Kids
    • Lifestyle & Wellness
    • Food & Drink
    • Music
    • Nature
    • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Contact Us
    • Customer Support
    • Advertise
    • Submit A News Tip
  • Print Edition
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
    • Where’s My Paper
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Log In
  • Free HV1 Trial
  • Subscribe to Our Newsletters
    • Hey Kingston
    • New Paltz Times
    • Woodstock Times
    • Week in Review

© 2022 Ulster Publishing