fbpx
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Print Edition
    • Get Home Delivery
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Submit Your Event
    • Customer Support
    • Submit A News Tip
    • Send Letter to the Editor
    • Where’s My Paper?
  • Our Newsletters
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial
Hudson Valley One
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s UP
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Subscribe to the What’s UP newsletter
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Log Out
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s UP
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Subscribe to the What’s UP newsletter
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Log Out
No Result
View All Result
Hudson Valley One
No Result
View All Result

Riverkeeper urges strict review of NYC reservoir releases

by Nick Henderson
April 2, 2016
in Politics & Government
0
Environmentalists say the creek’s ecosystem has been disrupted by the releases
Environmentalists say the creek’s ecosystem has been disrupted by the releases

The environmental group Riverkeeper is engaging Saugerties residents in a letter and email campaign to ask the state to require the strictest review possible for New York City’s discharges of muddy reservoir water into the Esopus Creek.

Critics say higher flow from the releases has caused property erosion and environmental damage.

“Everyone in this room shares a common concern,” said Town Board member Leeanne Thornton at a July 14 meeting at the Senior Center. “We’re not happy about the releases … We’re committed as a town to do everything that we can to bring about some changes in Albany regarding what’s going on.”

Saugerties recently joined the Coalition of the Lower Esopus Watershed Communities, which was formed to have a greater voice on Esopus turbidity issues.

“Farmers had some very specific impacts that they’ve suffered, including clogging of their irrigation equipment and inability to access fields because of high-volume releases,” said Kate Hudson, Riverkeeper’s watershed program director.

The water discharges are necessary because the city’s system is unfiltered. Based on the design of the reservoir, the West Basin is supposed to give turbid water a chance to settle out, Hudson explained. The problem is that the DEP, under pressure to keep water supplies plentiful, has kept the Ashokan Reservoir near 100 percent. Heavy rains will cause the West Basin to overflow into the East Basin.

New limits on the use of the chemical aluminum sulfate, which helps the particulates suspended in the reservoir system settle to the bottom, has also played a role.

“The DEC sees that use of alum as having an environmental impact and they are directing the city to reduce their use of alum,” said Hudson. “As a result, they’re going to have to reduce the turbidity of the water that they’re putting into the Catskill Aqueduct. As a result, they’re going to have to discharge more water (into the Esopus), at least under the current scenario.”

Riverkeeper views the discharges as an unpermitted release of pollutants. Hudson said based on previous experience, “it’s unlikely the DEC would take that position with the city.” Hence the need for public pressure.

Now called the Ashokan Release Channel, the waste channel used to discharge water to the Lower Esopus was part of the original design and construction of Ashokan Reservoir 100 years ago, but it wasn’t meant for discharge of turbid water.

“It was never used until 2006,” said Hudson. “And the reason it started being used in 2006 is because the Gilboa Dam at the Schoharie Reservoir was failing and they needed to get a whole bunch of water out of the reservoir so they could start doing repair work on the dam.

“It was not until 2010 that they proposed using the waste channel as a turbidity control mechanism for the Catskill system, which is something different from just using it as an emergency measure to be able to do a repair on the dam.”

As Saugerties Lighthouse keeper, village Trustee Patrick Landewe has seen firsthand the effects of muddy water as it pours from the creek into the Hudson River. He thinks the DEP’s approach is headed in the wrong direction.

“There’s more water available and people are using less,” Landewe said. “They’re not managing it properly.”

He suggested getting the New York Department of State involved since the Lower Esopus is in a designated Coastal Zone Area. Another state agency involved might strengthen the town’s case.

He also said that part of the designation includes scenic value. Any degradation could affect fishing and tourism.

“If the creek is running brown, do you think fishermen will be coming to the creek to launch their boats?” he asked.

Ulster County Legislator Chris Allen, who represents the town and village of Saugerties, said the city had the opportunity to approach the problem properly with filtration plants, but squandered it.

“They could have built these filtration plants 30, 40 years ago when there was federal grant money available, and at a fraction of the cost,” he said. “It’s the proverbial 800-pound gorilla in the room. Nobody wants to talk about the $8-$10 billion solution to the problem.”

The DEC public comment period closes Aug. 22.

Comments can be addressed to NYSDEC Central Office – Division of Environmental Permits, Attn: Stephen Tomasik, Project Manager, 625 Broadway, 4th Floor, Albany, N.Y. 12233-1750.

Comments can be sent by email to ashokan@gw.state.ny.us. Riverkeeper also has a suggested letter that can be edited and personalized on its website at riverkeeper.org/get-involved/take-action. Look for the link “Demand Alternatives to Flushing Mud Down the Esopus Creek.”

“We think that there’s actually a lot of alternatives that are possible,” said Hudson. “The reason why they started to do the releases to the Lower Esopus is because nobody ever made [DEP] do an environmental impact statement before. They were never required to look at the impacts to the Lower Esopus, and so they just picked the cheapest way to control turbidity in the water supply system.”

Tags: DEPesopus creek
Join the family! Grab a free month of HV1 from the folks who have brought you substantive local news since 1972. We made it 50 years thanks to support from readers like you. Help us keep real journalism alive.
- Geddy Sveikauskas, Publisher

Nick Henderson

Nick Henderson was raised in Woodstock starting at the age of three and attended Onteora schools, then SUNY New Paltz after spending a year at SUNY Potsdam under the misguided belief he would become a music teacher. He became the news director at college radio station WFNP, where he caught the journalism bug and the rest is history. He spent four years as City Hall reporter for Foster’s Daily Democrat in Dover, NH, then moved back to Woodstock in 2003 and worked on the Daily Freeman copy desk until 2013. He has covered Woodstock for Ulster Publishing since early 2014.

Related Posts

Hurley clerk and highway superintendent races
Politics & Government

Hurley clerk and highway superintendent races

June 10, 2025
Three candidates for two seats
Politics & Government

Three candidates for two seats

June 10, 2025
New Paltz planners need help reviewing 650-unit apartment proposal
Politics & Government

Public hearing kicks off for controversial New Paltz Apartments annexation

June 9, 2025
The Hurley primary
Politics & Government

The Hurley primary

June 4, 2025
Words aplenty fly in Woodstock primary
Politics & Government

Words aplenty fly in Woodstock primary

June 4, 2025
Kingston Common Council has second thoughts
Politics & Government

Kingston Common Council has second thoughts

June 3, 2025
Next Post

New Paltz volunteer firefighters save fallen Clydesdale

Weather

Kingston, NY
70°
Cloudy
5:18 am8:32 pm EDT
Feels like: 70°F
Wind: 2mph S
Humidity: 81%
Pressure: 29.84"Hg
UV index: 4
WedThuFri
82°F / 63°F
84°F / 57°F
77°F / 59°F
Kingston, NY 10 days weather forecast ▸

Subscribe

Independent. Local. Substantive. Subscribe now.

  • Subscribe & Support
  • Print Edition
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
  • Our Newsletters
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial

© 2022 Ulster Publishing

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Art
    • Books
    • Kids
    • Lifestyle & Wellness
    • Food & Drink
    • Music
    • Nature
    • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Contact Us
    • Customer Support
    • Advertise
    • Submit A News Tip
  • Print Edition
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
    • Where’s My Paper
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Log In
  • Free HV1 Trial
  • Subscribe to Our Newsletters
    • Hey Kingston
    • New Paltz Times
    • Woodstock Times
    • Week in Review

© 2022 Ulster Publishing