fbpx
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Sign up for Free Newsletter
  • Print Edition
    • Get Home Delivery
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Customer Support
    • Submit A News Tip
    • Where’s My Paper?
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial
Hudson Valley One
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Featured Events
      • Art
      • Books
      • Kids
      • Lifestyle & Wellness
      • Food & Drink
      • Music
      • Nature
      • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Help Wanted
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Podcast
  • Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Featured Events
      • Art
      • Books
      • Kids
      • Lifestyle & Wellness
      • Food & Drink
      • Music
      • Nature
      • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Help Wanted
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Podcast
  • Log In
No Result
View All Result
Hudson Valley One
No Result
View All Result

Common Council supports tax breaks for Kingstonian

by Terence P. Ward
August 12, 2020
in Politics & Government
4
Kingstonian tax breaks endorsed by city Finance and Audit Committee

A rendering of the Kingstonian from the light at Kingston Plaza, looking toward Fair Street Extension, which runs between Schwenk Drive (foreground) and

(Photo provided)

Kingston Common Council members voted 8-1 on Aug. 4 in support of a 25-year payment-in-lieu-of-taxes agreement for the Kingstonian, a mixed-use apartment, commercial and parking project proposed for the site of the former parking garage between North Front Street and Schwenk Drive. The agreement will now move to the county’s Industrial Development Agency for consideration on Wednesday, Aug. 12.

The agreement has been modified since it was discussed last week before the city’s finance and audit committee. The property tax for the first year will now be $40,000 rather than $28,488 and increase by three percent annually, and the profit-sharing with taxing authorities (including the county, city and school district) was bumped up from three percent to five. Renters of the 14 affordable units will have their cost for a dedicated parking space cut by 50 percent, and those units will remain affordable for the life of the project, rather than just the length of the PILOT agreement. Unchanged are other amenities, mostly in the category of public access, including the pedestrian plaza, foot bridge, and public bathrooms; they are additionally pledging to make a significant number of parking spaces available to the public for paid use. Developers will also provide two paid internships for students and fund a scholarship over 10 years.

Council members praised developers for being willing to continue to negotiate additional terms until the last moment, with Michele Hirsch, a “nay” vote last week, saying she was “very pleased with the process.” The elected representatives were focused largely on the increased availability of parking—central to the request for proposals which brought this project to the fore—as well as the anticipated indirect economic benefits for the uptown area.

While there were no votes in opposition, that isn’t to say that no one in the community has misgivings about tax breaks for this project. Some of the concerns that were expressed by a number of residents in written public comment were laid out last month in kingstoncitizens.org blog post. According to that post, many of the financial projections have been classified as trade secrets and kept from public scrutiny, and the parking needs of the project are not yet clear. In order for 277 spots to be available for paid use by members of the public, only 143 would be reserved for residents and business uses. However, the blog post author suggests that under current zoning code, the apartments and hotel rooms would themselves require 277 spaces, which would undercut the value of the central public benefit parking. In any case, the spots available to the public will result in revenue for the developer, rather than the municipality.

In that post it’s noted that developers justify paying a lower amount of school taxes than a project of that value would otherwise pay by predicting few schoolchildren will live in the project; the unnamed author writes in response, “Is education not a public good to which we all have a responsibility to pay? On this logic, those without children in the public school system should not be required to pay school taxes. Yet we pay school taxes irrespective of whether we have children who attend public school because we all benefit from an educated populace.”

It appears all of the 45 comments in opposition were identically worded, and since officials holding a public hearing are expected to consider the weight rather than the volume of testimony, that may have factored into the decision to support the PILOT. The boilerplate comments include the phrase, “In the midst of a financial crisis, the substantial loss of $30.6 million in tax receipts will have a profound effect on the community.” (That figure refers to the difference between what the project would pay with and without a PILOT agreement.)

Alderman Jeffrey Ventura Morell echoed some of those concerns. Though he voted in favor, he called on developers to release more information about project finances and parking needs.

Tony Davis, an outspoken supporter of the project, referenced how contentious the process has been. He said he’s received many “nasty emails” as a result, but “when you start attacking my wife when she’s out in public, that’s crossing a line.”

Steven Schabot recused himself because he is an employee of Herzog Supply Co., the principal of which is one of the partners in this development. His recusal was marked as a “nay” vote due to council rules. He remarked at the meeting that he didn’t see this as a problem, but recognized that there is a perception of a conflict of interest.

Tags: kingstonian
Thank you for reading Hudson Valley One. We rely on your support to continue providing local, substantive news. Please check out our subscription options to keep local journalism alive in the Hudson Valley.
- Geddy Sveikauskas, Publisher
Previous Post

Central Hudson: 12,000 still without power following tropical storm

Next Post

Kingston shootings: State & county collaboration announced to address increased incidents  

Terence P. Ward

Terence P Ward resides in New Paltz, where he reports on local events, writes books about religious minorities, tends a wild garden and communes with cats.

Related Posts

Join BioBlitz in Woodstock
Environment

Woodstock board weighs consequences of land designation in Zena

June 30, 2022
Shrestha upsets Cahill while Hochul, Delgado prevail in Dem primaries
Politics & Government

Shrestha upsets Cahill while Hochul, Delgado prevail in Dem primaries

June 29, 2022
Woodstock assessor Marc Plate retiring
Politics & Government

Saugerties code aide retires, comes back part time

June 25, 2022
Election 2018: Who’s on the ballot?
Politics & Government

State primaries are June 28

June 24, 2022
Discovering how to fix the Discovery Institute
Politics & Government

Saugerties planner Ken Goldberg resigns

June 24, 2022
Two carriers now up & running on Gardiner cell tower
Politics & Government

Gardiner greenlights controversial cell tower at Highway Garage site

June 23, 2022
Next Post
Kingston’s Midtown Gem: Beautiful Old City Hall

Kingston shootings: State & county collaboration announced to address increased incidents  

Please login to join discussion

Trending News

  • Shrestha upsets Cahill while Hochul, Delgado prevail in Dem primaries 1.7k views
  • AutoCamp Catskills brings fleet of Airstreams to former Saugerties KOA 1.7k views
  • Planned auto repair shop in Saugerties concerns neighbors 1.1k views
  • Led Zeppelin 1 at Colony in Woodstock July 1 468 views
  • Saugerties retired employees to give graduation awards 404 views







Latest HV1 Podcast

Weather

Kingston
◉
63°
Sunny
5:24am8:35pm EDT
Feels like: 63°F
Wind: 2mph NNE
Humidity: 81%
Pressure: 30.23"Hg
UV index: 2
FriSatSun
93/72°F
84/63°F
86/59°F
Weather forecast Kingston, New York ▸

Ulster County COVID-19 Active Cases

Subscribe

Independent. Local. Substantive. Subscribe now.

  • Subscribe & Support
  • Sign up for Free Newsletter
  • Print Edition
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Contact
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Free HV1 Trial

© 2022 Ulster Publishing

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Sports
    • Crime
    • Politics & Government
  • What’s Happening
    • Calendar Of Events
    • Featured Events
      • Art
      • Books
      • Kids
      • Lifestyle & Wellness
      • Food & Drink
      • Music
      • Nature
      • Stage & Screen
  • Opinions
    • Letters
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Local
    • Special Sections
    • Local History
  • Marketplace
    • All Classified Ads
    • Help Wanted
    • Post a Classified Ad
  • Obituaries
  • Podcast
  • Subscribe & Support
  • Contact Us
    • Customer Support
    • Advertise
    • Submit A News Tip
  • Print Edition
    • Read ePaper Online
    • Newsstand Locations
    • Where’s My Paper
  • HV1 Magazines
  • Manage HV1 Account
  • Log In
  • Free HV1 Trial

© 2022 Ulster Publishing