Cooper Lake conundrum

(Photo by Dion Ogust)

(Photo by Dion Ogust)

Backers of a proposal to sell City of Kingston water to a national bottling company say revenue from the deal could allow the city to replace and upgrade its century old infrastructure — without passing the costs on to residents.

But the plan is already a flop with some in the community, who call it a risky bet with a precious commodity.

The proposal by California-based Niagara Bottling calls for the construction of a sprawling bottling and shipping facility on a 57-acre parcel in the Town of Ulster once owned by IBM. The plant — if and when it’s running at full capacity — would use up to 1.75 million gallons of City of Kingston water each day. The water would be piped in from Cooper Lake using a water main that once serviced the massive, now largely vacant, IBM plant. Niagara has said it may also need to construct a second water line running parallel to the existing system using existing easements in Kingston and the Town of Ulster.


In an interview this week, Kingston Water Department Superintendent Judith Hansen said that Niagara first approached the department, which has broad authority to operate independently, back in April. The inquiry spurred a round of what Hansen called “due diligence” by consultants working with the department to see if the project was feasible, given the city water system’s capacity. Kingston’s water supply originates in Woodstock where Mink Hollow feeds into the man-made Cooper Lake. The water is then piped to a filtering facility on Sawkill Road and onto a holding reservoir where it undergoes a round of ultraviolet purification before entering the city’s water mains.

Hansen said the system can provide up to 6 million gallons of water a day. Currently the system provides a little less than 4 million gallons a day to city residents and the Town of Ulster; one-fifth of those 4 million gallons is lost due to leaks in the century-plus-old infrastructure. (Hansen said the department planned to undertake a leakage remediation program next year.)

Hansen added that while the company had requested a maximum capacity of 1.75 million gallons a day, “for their own corporate reasons” actual daily usage would probably be closer to 1 million gallons daily.

Based on the analysis provided by consultants, the Board of Water Commissioners authorized a “will share” letter. The letter indicates that the city is capable of providing the requested water, providing certain conditions are met and current customers not adversely impacted. It is unclear when the five-member board discussed the letter. The Niagara proposal is mentioned in the minutes of an April meeting of the five-member board, but not subsequently.

The proposal did not come to widespread public attention until last month, when an engineer working for Niagara presented the proposal to the Town of Ulster Planning Board. The presentation was the first step in a state-mandated environmental review that will assess and seek to mitigate potential adverse impacts of the plan.


Not yet committed

Hansen noted that the “will serve” letter does not bind the city to any agreement with the bottling firm or establish what Niagara would pay for the water service. The Town of Ulster pays $2.88 per 1,000 gallons for up to 700,000 gallons each day. But Hansen said Niagara would be charged at a higher, but yet to be determined, rate.

“Providing drinking water to your neighbors is a little different from providing it to a commercial account,” said Hansen.

There are 2 comments

  1. Donna Graham

    “Fearing manipulation or outright plunder by corrupt politicians.” My concerns in a nutshell. And as a resident of Lake Hill where Cooper Lake is located, I’m deeply concerned about the effect this will have on the community’s water table during drought season. We already experience low water pressure and sediment from our wells in summer months. I have real doubts whether our needs will be ‘given priority’ during drought season. This has to be addressed in the SEQR review.

Comments are closed.